In this guest blog following the launch of the Alliance for Useful Evidence, Professor Jonathan Shepherd discusses how increasing the demand for rigorous evidence will involve capitalising on the instinct of all decision makers.
Membership is free and open to any individual or organisation.Join the Alliance
We are delighted to announce the creation of the Alliance for Useful Evidence, a partnership project between Nesta, the Big Lottery Fund and the ESRC.
Ruth Puttick explores the issue of multiple interpretations of evidence and the challenges this poses for policy-making.
Dan James explores opportunities which the opening-up of data offers.
Ruth Puttick draws attention to the importance of the public as a key ally in both advancing the evidence agenda and helping to demand better evidence to underpin the decision-making in public services.
To begin our second week of blogs, Ruth Puttick explores the conflicts which can emerge between research and political ideology.
Ruth Puttick discusses the value of being more open and frank about negative findings .
Ruth Puttick discusses the need to stimulate the demand for evidence and the importance of ensuring that evidence is both easier to understand and decision-makers find it much harder to ignore.
Ruth Puttick explores and addresses the myths around the practice of RCTs.
Ruth Puttick explores incorporating the seemingly incongruous paring of innovation and evidence within practice.
In the first of a series of ten blogs, Ruth Puttick asks, 'what does evidence-based actually mean?'
In our very first blog we outline an introductory series of ten blogs which will address some of the challenges and barriers that are frequently encountered when trying to advance the use of evidence in decision-making.